
TAG Body Spray
Proctor and Gamble
In 2005, Gillette was acquired by Procter & Gamble, and in addition to the disposable razor business, P&G acquired all the other brands owned by Gillette. One of these brands was TAG body spray, which was intended to be a direct competitor to AXE body spray. Despite $145 million in net sales over five years, P&G eliminated the Tag brand in 2010 to focus on growing their larger and more global antiperspirant and deodorant brands, i.e.; Old Spice.
In 2010, Castle and Bishop Financial approached Procter & Gamble with an interested buyer to purchase the TAG brand, and successfully negotiated a contract. The proposed buyer, however, was unable to finalize the purchase and backed out from the transaction.
Despite the embarrassment of a broken deal with one of the largest consumer product companies in the world, Castle and Bishop Financial continued its’ relentless efforts to find a qualified buyer for TAG. It became a corporate mission for Castle and Bishop to redeem its’ reputation, so in 2016, they returned to Procter & Gamble with a new buyer along with proof of funds, and the transaction for TAG was finalized.
Slide title
Write your caption hereButtonSlide title
Write your caption hereButtonSlide title
Write your caption hereButtonSlide title
Write your caption hereButtonSlide title
Write your caption hereButtonSlide title
Write your caption hereButton
TAG Body Spray
Proctor and Gamble
In 2005, Gillette was acquired by Procter & Gamble, and in addition to the disposable razor business, P&G acquired all the other brands owned by Gillette. One of these brands was TAG body spray, which was intended to be a direct competitor to AXE body spray. Despite $145 million in net sales over five years, P&G eliminated the Tag brand in 2010 to focus on growing their larger and more global antiperspirant and deodorant brands, i.e.; Old Spice.
In 2010, Castle and Bishop Financial approached Procter & Gamble with an interested buyer to purchase the TAG brand, and successfully negotiated a contract. The proposed buyer, however, was unable to finalize the purchase and backed out from the transaction.
Despite the embarrassment of a broken deal with one of the largest consumer product companies in the world, Castle and Bishop Financial continued its’ relentless efforts to find a qualified buyer for TAG. It became a corporate mission for Castle and Bishop to redeem its’ reputation, so in 2016, they returned to Procter & Gamble with a new buyer along with proof of funds, and the transaction for TAG was finalized.
Slide title
Write your caption hereButtonSlide title
Write your caption hereButtonSlide title
Write your caption hereButtonSlide title
Write your caption hereButtonSlide title
Write your caption hereButtonSlide title
Write your caption hereButton